4.7 Article

Multi-View Partial Multi-Label Learning via Graph-Fusion-Based Label Enhancement

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2022.3232482

关键词

Label enhancement; label distribution; partial multi-label learning; multi-label learning; label ambiguity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel approach for multi-view partial multi-label learning, which learns predictive model and incorrect-labeling model jointly by incorporating the topological structure of the feature space. The experimental results on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for solving such learning problems.
Multi-view partial multi-label learning (MVPML) aims to learn a multi-label predictive model from the training examples, each of which is presented by multiple feature vectors while associated with a set of candidate labels where only a subset is correct. Generally, existing techniques work simply by identifying the ground-truth label via aggregating the features from all views to train a final classifier, but ignore the cause of the incorrect labels in the candidate label sets, i.e., the diverse property of the representation from different views leads to the incorrect labels which form the candidate labels alone with the essential supervision. In this paper, a novel MVPML approach is proposed to learn the predictive model and the incorrect-labeling model jointly by incorporating the graph-fusion-based topological structure of the feature space. Specifically, the latent label distribution and the incorrect labels are identified simultaneously in a unified framework under the supervision of candidate labels. In addition, a common topological structure of the feature space from all views is learned via the graph fusion for further capturing the latent label distribution. Experimental results on the real-world datasets clearly validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for solving multi-view partial multi-label learning problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据