4.7 Article

Inferring Cognitive State of Pilot's Brain Under Different Maneuvers During Flight

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3189981

关键词

Fatigue; Brain modeling; Electroencephalography; Feature extraction; Generative adversarial networks; Electrodes; Bayes methods; Cognitive detection; adversarial Bayesian deep network; adversarial noise; brain power map

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62171274, U1933125, 61825305]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Major Project [2021SHZDZX]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China through the Main Research Project on Machine Behavior and Human-Machine Collaborated Decision Making Methodology [72192820]
  4. Third Research Project on Human Behavior in Human-Machine Collaboration [72192822]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work proposes an adversarial Bayesian deep network for cognitive detection of pilot fatigue. Batch normalization and data enhancement are used to improve the generalization of neural networks, and a generator is employed to enhance the accuracy of fatigue state recognition. Adversarial noise is added near each brain electrode to reveal the correlation between cognitive state and brain region location.
This work designs an adversarial Bayesian deep network to solve the cognitive detection of pilot fatigue. Batch normalization and data enhancement are adopted in the posterior inference of the proposed model parameters to effectively improve the generalization of neural networks. The generator is used to enhance the brain power map generated from three cognitive indicators and improve the accuracy of fatigue state recognition. This work also adds adversarial noise in the vicinity of each brain electrode to form an adversarial image, which further reveals the correlation between the cognitive state of brain and the location of brain regions. Compared with other deep models and parameter optimization methods, our model achieves better detection accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据