4.8 Article

FairHealth: Long-Term Proportional Fairness-Driven 5G Edge Healthcare in Internet of Medical Things

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 8905-8915

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3183000

关键词

Medical services; Quality of service; 5G mobile communication; Dynamic scheduling; Delays; Resource management; Computational modeling; 5G; edge healthcare; Internet of Medical Things (IoMT); proportional fairness

资金

  1. NSFC [61972255, U21B2019]
  2. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a long-term proportional fairness-driven 5G edge healthcare system to address the unfairness issue caused by assuming altruistic patients sacrificing service quality in existing research. By establishing a Nash bargaining game model and designing a Lyapunov-based proportional-fairness resource scheduling algorithm, this system achieves a tradeoff between service stability and fairness.
Recently, the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) could offload healthcare services to 5G edge computing for low latency. However, some existing works assumed altruistic patients will sacrifice quality of service for the global optimum. For priority-aware and deadline-sensitive healthcare, this sufficient and simplified assumption will undermine the engagement enthusiasm, i.e., unfairness. To address this issue, we propose a long-term proportional fairness-driven 5G edge healthcare, i.e., FairHealth. First, we establish a long-term Nash bargaining game to model the service offloading, considering the stochastic demand and dynamic environment. We then design a Lyapunov-based proportional-fairness resource scheduling algorithm, which decouples the long-term fairness problem into single-slot subproblems, realizing a tradeoff between service stability and fairness. Moreover, we propose a block-coordinate descent method to iteratively solve nonconvex fair subproblems. Simulation results show that our scheme can improve 74.44% of the fairness index (i.e., Nash product), compared with the classic global time-optimal scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据