4.8 Article

TAB-SAPP: A Trust-Aware Blockchain-Based Seamless Authentication for Massive IoT-Enabled Industrial Applications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 243-250

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3159164

关键词

Authentication; Internet of Things; Cloud computing; Blockchains; Security; Servers; Privacy; Authentication; blockchain; networking systems; smart cities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a trust-aware blockchain-based seamless authentication with privacy-preserving (TAB-SAPP) method to address the issues of privacy, security, and packet delivery in IoT applications. By utilizing identity management and a novel data traffic pattern, this method can expand user connectivity and improve communication metrics.
The advancement of sensory technologies proliferates the development of low-cost electronics systems to operate the environmental features of smart cities. Global urbanization integrates networking systems to offer computing-based practical solutions for improving the quality of application-oriented services. Few existing studies have primarily focused on a single-point vulnerability for decentralized IoT applications. However, very few mechanisms address the issues concerning privacy-preserving and trust-aware authentication for IoT-enabled industrial applications. Moreover, the existing schemes are in fact not applicable to real-time scenarios, such as decentralized networks and long-term evolution advanced networks. Thus, this article presents a trust-aware blockchain-based seamless authentication with privacy-preserving (TAB-SAPP) to resolve the critical things, such as privacy, security, and packet delivery ratio. In the proposed TAB-SAPP, a novel data traffic pattern is utilized using identity management to show that the proposed mechanism can be more functional in expanding users' connectivity to improve the communication metrics, such as packet delivery ratio and mobility speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据