4.8 Article

Deep Bayesian Slow Feature Extraction With Application to Industrial Inferential Modeling

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3129888

关键词

Feature extraction; Data models; Bayes methods; Probabilistic logic; Informatics; Linear programming; Standards; Deep learning (DL); industrial hydrocracking process; inferential modeling; probabilistic slow feature analysis (PSFA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inferential modeling plays a significant role in estimating quality-related process variables in modern manufacturing. This article proposes a new nonlinear extension of probabilistic slow feature analysis (PSFA) under the deep learning framework to enhance dynamic feature extraction and improve prediction accuracy by incorporating variational inference and Monte Carlo inference. The proposed model considers the relevance of inputs with outputs to enhance prediction performance. The model is validated through an industrial hydrocracking process and achieves a significant reduction in root mean squared error compared to PSFA.
Inferential modeling has been of significance for modern manufacturing in estimating the quality-related process variables. As an effective inferential model, probabilistic slow feature analysis (PSFA) has gained attention in regression tasks to interpret dynamic properties with a slowness preference. However, PSFA is often challenged by the nonlinear sequential data due to its linear state-space structure. In this article, a new nonlinear extension of PSFA is proposed under the deep learning framework to enhance the dynamic feature extraction with limited labels, incorporating variational inference and Monte Carlo inference to derive the objective function. The proposed model considers the relevance of inputs with outputs as the input weights to upgrade prediction performance. The proposed model is verified through an industrial hydrocracking process to predict diesel yield with missing labels ranged from 0% to 50%, and the root mean squared error is reduced by at least 8.78% compared to PSFA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据