4.8 Article

A Ten-Level Inverter Fed Drive Scheme with Extended Linear Modulation Range

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 12261-12269

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3134055

关键词

Induction motor (IM) drive; pulsewidth modulation (PWM); space vector structure (SVS); ten-level inverter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a ten-level inverter scheme is proposed to extend the linear modulation range (LMR) and increase the peak phase fundamental voltage. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme in increasing the LMR is experimentally validated, and the balancing of capacitor voltages throughout the modulation range is verified.
In this work, a ten-level inverter scheme is presented to extend the linear modulation range (LMR) by using a unique space vector pulsewidth modulation (SVPWM) technique, such that no lower order harmonics (such as 5th, 7th, 11th, and 13th, etc.) are present in the phase voltage as compared to six-step mode operation. The proposed scheme can increase the peak phase fundamental voltage of the inverter from 0.577 to 0.637V(dc) (maximum possible peak phase fundamental voltage of a conventional hexagonal space vector structure (SVS) voltage source inverters while operating in six-step mode), irrespective of the load power factor (p.f), where V-dc is the dc link voltage of the inverter. The ten-level inverter structure is formed using a two-level inverter and an H-bridge (HB) in cascade from one end and a floating capacitor-based two-level inverter cascaded with an HB from the other end to drive an open-end winding induction motor (OEWIM). All the HB capacitor voltages are balanced by using space vector redundancy. The claim of balancing the capacitor voltages throughout the whole modulation range is verified experimentally in this article. Experimental results at different steady-state and transient conditions are shown to validate the proposed inverter scheme's efficacy in increasing the LMR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据