4.8 Article

Approach to Inertial Compensation of HVdc Offshore Wind Farms by MMC With Ultracapacitor Energy Storage Integration

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 12988-12998

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3134092

关键词

Energy storage; inertial compensation; modular multilevel converter (MMC); ultracapacitor; wind power

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFB1500702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51777124, 52177187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the impact of grid connection of offshore wind farms through MMC-HVdc transmission system on low inertia issue and proposes a method to compensate for the inertia by integrating UESS into MMC.
Recent studies have shown that the grid connection of offshore wind farms through modular multilevel converter-high voltage direct current (MMC-HVdc) transmission system has brought low inertia issue. It is an urgent requirement for offshore wind farms to compensate for the inertia. After analysis and evaluation in this article, it is found that integrating an ultracapacitor energy storage system (UESS) into an MMC has an advantage comprehensively considering cost, size, and dynamic. Based on the evaluation, this article proposes an approach to inertial compensation of HVdc offshore wind farms by MMC-UESS integration. An ultracapacitor is selected as an energy storage element (ESE) for its high power density since the inertial response is a short-term response and it is hoped that added ESE does not significantly increase the size of an MMC submodule. Batteries with high energy density but low power density are not suitable for such applications. The optimal operating voltage of a UESS and the control scheme between MMC loops and inertial emulation are proposed in this article. Experimental results from real-time simulation and a downscaled prototype are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据