4.8 Article

On a Parametric Measure of Vagueness

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 343-347

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3182490

关键词

Fuzzy entropy; membership function; vagueness measure; fuzziness measure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the application of fuzzy sets, the greatest uncertainty occurs when the membership grade in a fuzzy set is equal to the membership grade in the complement of this fuzzy set. The fixed point of the standard Zadeh negation is 0.5, but in the case of a strong complement operator, it may not be 0.5. This paper introduces the concept of a parametric fuzziness measure called the nu-maximal vagueness measure.
In the application of fuzzy sets, the greatest uncertainty appears when the membership grade in a fuzzy set is equal to the membership grade in the complement of this fuzzy set. That is, the membership grade is equal to the value of the fixed point (nu) of the underlying complement (negation) operator. The fixed point of the standard Zadeh negation is 0.5. In fuzzy set theory, the complement of a fuzzy set can be defined using a strong complement (negation) operator that differs from the standard Zadeh negation. In this case, the fixed point of the strong complement (negation) operator is not necessarily 0.5. In this short paper, we present the concept of a parametric fuzziness measure called the nu-maximal vagueness measure. This new measure may be regarded as a generalized fuzziness measure. Here, we present an operator system-dependent kernel, which we call the nu-maximal vagueness entropy, and using this, we construct a nu-maximal vagueness measure. The proposed vagueness entropy is based on a common generator function of a strict triangular norm and a strong negation operator. The nu-maximal vagueness entropy is flexible and operator-dependent, and it can be readily adapted to a continuous-valued logical system. Furthermore, the parameter nu has a clear semantic meaning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据