4.7 Article

Effect of greenhouse soil management on soil aggregation and organic matter in northeast China

期刊

CATENA
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 412-419

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.013

关键词

Aggregate; Soil organic carbon; Tillage age; Solar greenhouse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171997]
  2. Fifth Session of Geping Green Action-123 Project of Liaoning Environmental Research and Education [CEPF2012-123-1-4]
  3. Shenyang Agricultural University of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of greenhouse soils on soil aggregation and soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling should be evaluated to maximize the benefits of solar greenhouses rationally. The relationship between aggregate stability and SOC fractions was investigated during a long-term greenhouse experiment for 16 years in Shenyang, China. Wet-sieving method was used to determine aggregate size distribution, water-stable aggregates, and mean weight diameter (MWD) as indices of soil aggregate stability. SOC fractions were also determined. The stability of macroaggregates decreased within 5 years of converting open vegetable fields to greenhouses, and a similar trend for MWD was observed. The stability of microaggregates also decreased. LF250 carbon in greenhouse soils was correlated with the amount of 2-0.25 mm size classes (r = 0.984**). As a result, a labile SOC existed in macroaggregates and was susceptible to loss. Positive correlations were also determined between water-stable microaggregates and intra-microaggregate particulate organic matter (r = 0.991**), between water-stable macroaggregates and intra-microaggregate particulate organic matter within macroaggregates (r = 0.998**), and between intra-microaggregate mineral-associated organic matter within macroaggregates (r = 0.971**). This result indicated that greenhouse soil management significantly affected the stability of aggregation and the cycle of soil organic matter. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据