4.5 Article

Efficient Fault-Tolerant Consensus for Collaborative Services in Edge Computing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 2139-2150

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2023.3238138

关键词

Consensus; edge computing; fault-tolerance; byzantine-resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel (a, b)-majority consensus problem based on a new failure model is investigated for fault-tolerant collaborative services in outdoor edge computing applications. A distributed protocol is presented to achieve (a, b)-majority consensus within a defined time frame, considering both physical and protocol layer failures. Empirical results from simulations validate the fault tolerance and efficiency of the proposed approach.
In many edge computing applications, edge devices are required to reach fault-tolerant consensus in order to provide collaborative services in outdoor environments. In this paper, we study a comprehensive (a, b)-majority consensus problem based on a novel failure model, which takes a distinct opinions as inputs and outputs a b-majority opinion as the final agreement. This problem formulation is drastically different from traditional ones, which usually require a majority consensus from the binary opinions of multiple supporters. It is more practical and flexible as it can accommodate more than 2 input opinions and output one that satisfies the application requirement defined by parameter b. We also consider physical layer in our failure model while previous models mainly focus on faults occurred in protocol layer and data layer. Based on this more realistic failure model and a more practical consensus problem definition, we present a distributed protocol for n edge devices to reach an (a, b)-majority consensus within T(n) time steps with high probability. Empirical results from our simulation studies validate the fault tolerance property and efficiency of our work in achieving the (a, b)-majority consensus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据