4.7 Article

Impedimetric Hydrogel Sensor for the Identification of Hexose Using Machine Learning

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 6272-6281

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3240750

关键词

Classification; hexose; hydrogel sensor; impedimetry; machine learning (ML)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a novel technique of hexose identification using a hydrogel sensor. The hydrogel uses poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and benzene-1,4-diboronic acid (1,4 BDBA) to break down boronate ester bonds when they come in contact with sugar samples, changing the gel impedance. A tree-construct algorithm is proposed to identify the hexose type, regardless of its concentration, using impedance data at 20 and 200 kHz. The algorithm includes 22 machine learning models and achieves good accuracy in identifying fructose and sucrose.
Determination of the type of sugar present in a beverage is one of the key parameter in assessing their nutritious values. This article presents a novel technique of hexose identification using hydrogel sensor in a sugar sample. The hydrogel uses poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and benzene-1,4-diboronic acid (1,4 BDBA) whose boronate ester bonds break down when they come in contact with sugar samples and change the gel impedance. A tree-construct algorithm is proposed to identify the hexose type, irrespective of its concentration from the impedance data of the proposed gel at 20 and 200 kHz. The algorithm includes 22 machine learning (ML) models for 22 different scenarios. The ML models are designed using MATLAB ML classifier toolbox based on 7452 datasets and 414 samples. The proposed algorithm is further validated using 300 test samples, and it is found that the true positive rate (TPR) in identifying fructose, glucose, galactose, and sucrose is 84.3%, 66.3%, 69.7%, and 80.7%, respectively. This indicates that the proposed hydrogel is more reliable for fructose and sucrose identification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据