4.4 Article

Scalable Undersized Dataset RF Classification: Using convolutional multistage training

期刊

IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION MAGAZINE
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 34-47

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/MAP.2022.3208813

关键词

Feature extraction; Training; Radio frequency; Convolution; Radar; Artificial neural networks; Standards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unlike areas such as computer vision and speech recognition, deep learning lacks a general approach suitable for radiofrequency systems. Existing approaches face problems in robustness, consistency, efficiency, repeatability, and scalability. In this article, a new deep learning approach based on multistage training is proposed and it shows significant improvement in radiofrequency sensing signal classification.
Unlike areas such as computer vision and speech recognition, where convolutional and recurrent neural network (NN)-based approaches have proven effective due to the nature of the respective areas of application, deep learning (DL) still lacks a general approach suitable for the unique nature and challenges of radiofrequency (RF) systems such as radar, signals intelligence, electronic warfare, and communications. Existing approaches face problems in robustness, consistency, efficiency, repeatability, and scalability. Some of the main challenges in radiofrequency (RF) sensing such as radar target identification are the difficulty and cost of obtaining data. Hundreds to thousands of samples per class are typically used when training for classifying signals into 2-12 classes with reported accuracy ranging from 87% to 99%, where accuracy generally decreases with more classes added. In this article, we present a new DL approach based on multistage training (MST) and demonstrate it on RF sensing signal classification. We consistently achieve more than 99% accuracy for up to 17 diverse classes using only 11 samples per class for training, a substantial improvement over standard DL approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据