4.6 Article

Macroinvertebrate assemblages in lowland streams under horticultural impact (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 850, 期 2, 页码 399-416

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05081-7

关键词

Functional feeding groups; Horticulture; Pampean streams; Pesticides; Stream communities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of horticultural land use on the taxonomic composition and functional feeding groups of freshwater macroinvertebrates in lowland streams. The results showed that horticultural activities increased nutrient and pesticide concentrations, negatively affecting the richness, density, and diversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages and leading to a dominance of tolerant families. Additionally, horticulture altered the trophic structure of macroinvertebrate assemblages.
This study aimed to determine the impact of horticultural land use on the taxonomic composition and the composition of functional feeding groups of freshwater macroinvertebrate assemblages in lowland streams. Three streams running through intensively cultivated plots were compared to three less impacted streams, two of which run through a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Nutrient and pesticide measured concentrations, as well as the macroinvertebrate assemblages associated with aquatic vegetation, were analyzed in each stream. These concentrations were higher at the horticultural streams, negatively correlated to the richness, density, and diversity of the macroinvertebrate assemblages, leading to a dominance of tolerant families. The trophic structure of the macroinvertebrates assemblages was dominated by collector-gatherers in the horticultural streams, while all functional feeding groups were more equally distributed in less impacted streams. We concluded that horticulture reduces biodiversity and changes the trophic structure of the macroinvertebrate assemblage, eventually affecting stream functions. Mitigation measures are required to preserve the structure and function of these ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据