4.7 Article

Comprehensive shape analysis of the cortex in Huntington's disease

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 1417-1431

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26125

关键词

cortical analysis; cortical shape; Huntington's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to the striatum, cortical alterations caused by Huntington's disease have been found, but there is inconsistency in using cortical thickness as a metric. This study proposes a comprehensive approach using cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and local gyrification index, and the results are consistent with prior findings while highlighting the complementary nature of these measures.
The striatum has traditionally been the focus of Huntington's disease research due to the primary insult to this region and its central role in motor symptoms. Beyond the striatum, evidence of cortical alterations caused by Huntington's disease has surfaced. However, findings are not coherent between studies which have used cortical thickness for Huntington's disease since it is the well-established cortical metric of interest in other diseases. In this study, we propose a more comprehensive approach to cortical morphology in Huntington's disease using cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and local gyrification index. Our results show consistency with prior findings in cortical thickness, including its limitations. Our comparison between cortical thickness and local gyrification index underscores the complementary nature of these two measures-cortical thickness detects changes in the sensorimotor and posterior areas while local gyrification index identifies insular differences. Since local gyrification index and cortical thickness measures detect changes in different regions, the two used in tandem could provide a clinically relevant measure of disease progression. Our findings suggest that differences in insular regions may correspond to earlier neurodegeneration and may provide a complementary cortical measure for detection of subtle early cortical changes due to Huntington's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据