4.7 Article

Common and unique dysconnectivity profiles of dorsal and median raphe in Parkinson's disease

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 1070-1078

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26139

关键词

functional connectivity; functional MRI; Parkinson's disease; raphe nuclei; resting state

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used rs-fMRI to investigate the functional connectivity profiles of the dorsal raphe and median raphe in PD patients and found associations between dysconnectivity of these nuclei and clinical phenotypes of PD. The results revealed decreased connectivity of the raphe nuclei with various brain regions in PD, and this dysconnectivity was correlated with symptoms such as depression, drowsiness, anxiety, cognitive deficits, sleep disturbances, and pain.
The serotonergic (5-HT) system, which undergoes degeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD), is involved in the pathogenesis of motor and nonmotor symptoms. The dorsal raphe (DR) and median raphe (MR) nuclei are the main source of 5-HT neurons, however, brain connectivity changes in these two nuclei have not been delineated in PD. Here we used resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) to characterize functional connectivity profiles of DR and MR and further examine the associations between dysconnectivity of raphe nuclei and clinical phenotypes of PD. We found that DR and MR commonly hypo-connected with the sensorimotor, temporal, and occipital cortex, limbic system, left thalamus, putamen, and cerebellum in PD. DR had unique decreased connectivity with the bilateral prefrontal and cingulate cortices, while MR had lower connectivity with the pons. Moreover, reduced connectivity of DR correlated with depression, drowsiness, and anxiety, whereas dysconnectivity of MR correlated with depression, cognitive deficits, sleep disturbances, and pain. Our findings highlight the complex roles of raphe nuclei in motor and nonmotor symptoms, providing novel insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pathogenesis of PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据