4.8 Article

Quantification of the hepatitis B virus cccDNA: evidence-based guidelines for monitoring the key obstacle of HBV cure

期刊

GUT
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 972-983

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328380

关键词

CHRONIC HEPATITIS; HEPATITIS B; LIVER; REAL TIME PCR; LIVER BIOPSY

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major goal of hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments is to reduce or inactivate intrahepatic viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). There are different methods for cccDNA quantification, such as Southern blot (SB) and quantitative PCR (qPCR). This study compared various protocols for cccDNA isolation and qPCR quantification in liver tissues and cell cultures, aiming to develop evidence-based guidance for best practices.
ObjectivesA major goal of curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments is the reduction or inactivation of intrahepatic viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Hence, precise cccDNA quantification is essential in preclinical and clinical studies. Southern blot (SB) permits cccDNA visualisation but lacks sensitivity and is very laborious. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has no such limitations but inaccurate quantification due to codetection of viral replicative intermediates (RI) can occur. The use of different samples, preservation conditions, DNA extraction, nuclease digestion methods and qPCR strategies has hindered standardisation. Within the ICE-HBV consortium, available and novel protocols for cccDNA isolation and qPCR quantification in liver tissues and cell cultures were compared in six laboratories to develop evidence-based guidance for best practices. DesignReference material (HBV-infected humanised mouse livers and HepG2-NTCP cells) was exchanged for cross-validation. Each group compared different DNA extraction methods (Hirt extraction, total DNA extraction with or without proteinase K treatment (+PK/-PK)) and nuclease digestion protocols (plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase (PSD), T5 exonuclease, exonucleases I/III). Samples were analysed by qPCR and SB. ResultsHirt and -PK extraction reduced coexisting RI forms. However, both cccDNA and the protein-free relaxed circular HBV DNA (pf-rcDNA) form were detected by qPCR. T5 and Exo I/III nucleases efficiently removed all RI forms. In contrast, PSD did not digest pf-rcDNA, but was less prone to induce cccDNA overdigestion. In stabilised tissues (eg, Allprotect), nucleases had detrimental effects on cccDNA. ConclusionsWe present here a comprehensive evidence-based guidance for optimising, controlling and validating cccDNA measurements using available qPCR assays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据