4.8 Article

Selective hydrogenolysis of bio-renewable tetrahydrofurfurylamine to piperidine on ReOx-modified Rh catalysts

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 3515-3523

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2gc04388b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel green synthesis of piperidine from bio-renewable tetrahydrofurfurylamine (THFAM) is reported. The process involves the hydrogenolysis of THFAM to 5-amino-1-pentanol (APO) and the subsequent intramolecular amination of APO. SiO2-supported Rh-ReOx catalysts showed high efficiency and stability in converting THFAM to piperidine with a yield of 91.5% under the conditions of 200 degrees C and 2.0 MPa H-2 in water. The study provides an efficient strategy for the green production of piperidine and its derivatives from biomass resources.
Piperidine is an important cyclic amine with versatile applications. However, its commercial process is not green and depends mainly on the hydrogenation of fossil resource-based pyridine. Here, we report a novel one-pot approach to the sustainable synthesis of piperidine from bio-renewable tetrahydrofurfurylamine (THFAM) via its hydrogenolysis to 5-amino-1-pentanol (APO) and the subsequent intramolecular amination of APO. SiO2-supported Rh-ReOx catalysts exhibited high efficiency and stability in the THFAM reaction to piperidine, providing a high yield of 91.5% at 200 degrees C and 2.0 MPa H-2 in water. Such high efficiency of Rh-ReOx/SiO2 was found to be related to the synergistic effect between the Rh nanoparticles and ReOx species on the kinetically-relevant cleavage of the C-O bond neighboring the C-NH2 group in THFAM, involving the strong adsorption of the C-NH2 group on ReOx and the heterolytic dissociation of H-2 on Rh. This work provides an efficient strategy for the selective cleavage of the C-O bonds neighboring the C-NH2 groups, irrespective of their presence in amino ethers or amino alcohols, and the green production of piperidine and its derivatives from biomass resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据