4.7 Article

Slow Fault Slip Signatures in Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL101064

关键词

slow earthquake; ionospheric disturbance; internal gravity wave; acoustic wave; tsunami earthquake; GNSS-TEC

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20K04120]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, President's International Fellowship Initiative [2022VEA0014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rise times of earthquake moment release affect the spectra of seismic waves. Slow fault movements in tsunami earthquakes can generate larger tsunamis than expected, while regular earthquakes have normal effects. Measurements of atmospheric waves excited by coseismic vertical crustal movements show that the amplitudes of internal gravity waves increase with magnitude, while the amplitudes of acoustic waves in tsunami earthquakes are normal.
Rise times of earthquake moment release influence the spectra of seismic waves. For example, slow fault movements in tsunami earthquakes excite larger tsunamis than expected from intensities of short-period seismic waves. Here we compare amplitudes of two different atmospheric waves, long-period internal gravity waves and short-period acoustic waves, excited by coseismic vertical crustal movements. We observe them as coseismic ionospheric disturbances by measuring ionospheric electrons using global navigation satellite systems. Four regular megathrust earthquakes M-w 8.0-9.0 showed that the internal gravity waves become ten times stronger as the magnitude increases by one. We found that the 2010 Mentawai earthquake, a typical tsunami earthquake, excited internal gravity waves stronger than those expected by this empirical relationship. On the other hand, amplitudes of acoustic waves excited by tsunami earthquakes were normal. This suggests that slow fault ruptures excite long-period atmospheric waves efficiently, leaving a slow earthquake signature in ionospheric disturbances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据