4.7 Article

Preferential preservation of low-elevation biotas in the nonmarine fossil record

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 111-114

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G50579.1

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern coastal sedimentary basins tend to be at lower elevations, while inland basins can reach higher elevations. Both types of basins generally preserve a narrow range of elevations, with coastal basins typically around 200-300 m. This selective preservation of low-elevation habitats suggests that much of ancient nonmarine biodiversity may not be preserved. Given the occurrence of modern biodiversity hotspots at high elevations, long ghost lineages and underestimated divergence times are likely common in the nonmarine fossil record.
Modern coastal sedimentary basins typically lie at low elevations (<600 m), whereas inland basins commonly occupy elevations as high as 4000-5000 m. Individual basins of all types typically preserve a narrower span of elevations, generally <1000 m, and typically near 200-300 m in coastal basins. As a result, the nonmarine fossil record is expected to preserve mainly low-elevation habitats and a relatively narrow range of elevations. Because many of the basins that preserve high elevations are likely to undergo subsequent destruction via erosion or continental collision, the dominance of low-elevation habitats is likely to become stronger into deep time. This selective preservation of nonmarine communities from sedimentary basins, and specifically from low elevations, suggests that much or even most of ancient nonmarine biodiversity is not preserved. Given the occurrence of many modern biodiversity hotspots in regions of high elevation, long ghost lineages are likely common in the nonmarine fossil record, and divergence times estimated from the nonmarine fossil record may be systematically far too short. The spans of elevations that are preserved in sedimentary basins suggest that the fossil record may preserve gradients in community composition that are correlated with elevation, yet they have been largely undetected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据