4.7 Article

Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite: Role of biochar as a redox mediator

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 102-116

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2023.01.027

关键词

Biochar; Bioreduction; Electron buffer; Nontronite; Shewanella putrefaciens CN32

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the role of biochar in Fe redox cycling through bioreduction experiments. The concentration of biochar affects the reduction rate and extent of Fe(III). The presence of biochar creates two pathways for electron transfer, and the electron shuttling role of biochar enhances the rate of Fe(III) bioreduction. However, high concentration of biochar can impair both pathways and inhibit Fe(III) bioreduction.
Biochar naturally occurs in soils and sediments as a result of wildfire, but its role in Fe redox cycling is poorly known. In this study, bioreduction experiments were conducted with lactate as the electron donor, Fe(III) in nontronite (NAu-2) or ferric citrate as the electron acceptor, and Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 as the Fe(III)-reducing bacterium in the absence and presence of biochar. High biochar concentrations increased but low concentrations decreased the reduction rate and extent. When NAu-2 was replaced with ferric citrate [aqueous Fe(III)-citrate complex], while the rate was enhanced, the extent of bioreduc- tion remained unchanged at low biochar concentration but declined at high biochar concentration. These different redox behaviors of biochar can be explained by the interplay among four factors: (1) the elec- tron shuttling role of biochar; (2) the electron buffering capacity of biochar; (3) the effect of biochar sur- face on cell distribution; (4) the effect of biochar on cell attachment and growth. In the absence of biochar, the electron transfer pathway is from cells directly to Fe(III) (Pathway 1). However, in the pres- ence of biochar, there is a second pathway (Pathway 2), i.e., from attached cells to biochar and from bio- char to Fe(III). At low biochar concentrations, the presence of biochar decreases the efficiency of Pathway 1 because some cells are diverted to biochar surface, but this deficiency is not made up by Pathway 2 because of physical separation between negatively-charged biochar and NAu-2 particles. Therefore, even though biochar particles receive electrons from attached cells, they are not able to transfer them to NAu- 2, thus retaining a proportion of electrons. Possible cell clumping on biochar surface may decrease effec- tive cell concentration and thus pose additional inhibition of NAu-2 bioreduction. However, in the treat- ment of soluble Fe(III)-citrate complex, Pathway 2 is still effective, because there is no physical barrier between biochar and soluble Fe(III). The electron shuttling role of biochar actually increases the rate of Fe(III) bioreduction.As biochar concentration increases, large surface area of biochar spreads out cells and increases the probability of encounter between cells and NAu-2 particles. In this case, both pathways are effective. Increasing biochar concentrations result in fewer electron retention per gram of biochar. Possible cell growth on biochar surface would further enhance Pathway 2. Therefore, the overall result is the enhanced rate and extent of Fe(III) bioreduction in NAu-2. However, for soluble Fe(III)-citrate complex, both path- ways may be impaired because high concentration of biochar would accumulate toxic substances and decrease concentration of cells, which would inhibit Fe(III) bioreduction. As biochar accumulates in soils, the role of biochar is expected to greatly impact Fe redox reactions and other environmental processes.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据