4.6 Article

The impact of deleting the mitfa gene in zebrafish on the intestinal microbiota community

期刊

GENE
卷 846, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146870

关键词

Mitfa; Intestinal microbiota; Knockout; Lipid metabolism; Immunity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21806041]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515010367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the intestinal microbiota composition between mitfa knockout zebrafish and wild-type zebrafish, and found that the deletion of mitfa gene can cause changes in the composition of intestinal microbiota and affect the expression levels of immune and metabolism-related genes.
To explore the relationship between the mitfa gene and intestinal microbiota, the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed to compare the intestinal microbiota composition of the mitfa knockout zebrafish line (CKO group) and the wild-type zebrafish (WT group) in this study. The results showed that the Fusobacteria and Firmicutes were significantly decreased and the Dependentiae and Patescibacteria were significantly increased in the CKO group at the phylum level. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Citrobacter, Gordonia, Meso-rhizobium, Legionella, and Bradyrhizobium were extremely higher in the CKO group, whereas the other four genera Nocardia, Pannonibacter, Shinella, and Cetobacterium were significantly declined in the CKO group at the genus level. Due to these changed intestinal microbiota appear to be related to lipid metabolism and im-munity, eight lipid metabolism-related genes and nine inflammation-related genes were detected in the intes-tinal. The results showed that the expression levels of these genes were significant differences between the CKO and WT group. These results indicated that the deletion of mitfa can affect the expression levels of immune and metabolism-related genes, and causing changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据