4.6 Article

Modulation of phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthetic pathway is crucial for conferring resistance in pigeon pea against Fusarium wilt

期刊

GENE
卷 851, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146994

关键词

Phenylpropanoid metabolism; Lignin; Phenolic acids; Enzyme activity; Fusarium udum; Pigeon pea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study elucidates the role of the phenylpropanoid pathway in resistance expression during compatible and incompatible interactions in pigeon pea. The results show that the increased activity of phenylpropanoid pathway-associated defense enzymes and higher levels of phenolics and lignin are associated with resistance. Additionally, differential expression of lignin biosynthesis genes is important in resistance against wilt.
To elucidate the role of the phenylpropanoid pathway in the expression of resistance during compatible and incompatible interactions between pigeon pea and wilt-causing vascular pathogen Fusarium udum, we estimated the total phenol content, lignin, phenolic acids and activity of enzymes involved in lignin polymerization of monolignols and examined the expression pattern of lignin biosynthesis genes. Our results demonstrated a higher accumulation of free and cell wall-bound phenolics and total lignin content in the highly resistant pigeon pea genotype ICP 14623 as compared to susceptible genotype ICP 14166. An increased activity of phenylpropanoid pathway-associated defense enzymes such as Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, polyphenol oxidase, ascorbate and guaiacol-dependent peroxidases in resistant pigeon pea genotypes suggests their role in resistance. Moreover, analysis of lignin biosynthesis genes revealed their differential expression during resistant and susceptible in-teractions, revealed their crucial role in imparting resistance against wilt. Overall, our results indicated the role of physical and biochemical components of the phenylpropanoid pathway in the expression of resistance in pigeon pea against Fusarium wilt.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据