Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a Western multicenter prospective cohort study

Background and Aims: Recent Western studies support the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions throughout the GI tract. Although admission for observation after ESD is standard in Asia, a more selective approach may optimize resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasi-bility of same-day discharge (SDD) after ESD and factors associated with admission. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort of patients undergoing ESD (2016-2021). The primary end points were safety of SDD and factors associated with post-ESD admission. Results: Of 831 patients (median age, 67 years; 57% male) undergoing 831 ESDs (240 performed in the esoph-agus, 126 in the stomach, and 465 in the colorectum; median lesion size, 44 mm), 588 (71%) were SDD versus 243 (29%) admissions. Delayed bleeding and perforation occurred in 12 (2%) and 4 (.7%) of SDD patients, respec-tively; only 1 (.2%) required surgery. Of the 243 admissions, 223 (92%) were discharged after <24 hours of obser-vation. Interestingly, larger lesion size (>44 mm) was not associated with higher admission rate (odds ratio [OR], .5; 95% confidence interval [CI], .3-.8; P = .001). Lesions in the upper GI tract versus colon (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; P = .01), invasive cancer (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; P = .01), and adverse events (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P = .001) were independent factors for admission. Admissions were more likely performed by endoscopists with ESD volume <50 cases (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.3; P = .001) with procedure time >75 minutes (OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 8.5-21.3; P < .0001). Conclusions: SDD after ESD can be safe and feasible. Patients with invasive cancer, lesions in the upper GI tract, longer procedure times, or procedures performed by low-volume ESD endoscopists are more likely to be admitted postprocedure. Risk stratification of patients for SDD after ESD should help optimize resource utiliza-tion and enhance ESD uptake in the West. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.) (Gastrointest En-dosc 2023;97:1045-51.)

Automated summary

Recent Western studies support the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions throughout the GI tract. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after ESD and factors associated with post-ESD admission.