4.7 Article

Experimental study on the structure and reactivity of char in pressurized O2/H2O atmosphere

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107469

关键词

Char; O2/H2O; Pressurization; Structure; Reactivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876050]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Uni [2022ZFJH004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressurization and H2O were found to promote char conversion and facilitate the formation of carbon-oxygen bonds on the char surface. Pressure mainly affected the consumption and generation of micropores, while H2O had no selective effect on the pore structure. At low pressure and low H2O concentration, pressurization and H2O could promote the formation of C(O) on the char surface, but the reactivity of char decreased and then increased with increasing pressure and H2O concentration.
Pressurized O-2/H2O combustion is regarded as a promising high-efficiency CCS technology. In this study, char combustion in a pressurized O-2/H2O atmosphere was performed with a pressurized horizontal tube furnace. The effects of pressure (0.1-1.3 MPa) and H2O concentration (0-60%) on char conversion, char physicochemical structure and reactivity were investigated by means of XPS, Raman, temperature-programed desorption and TGA tests. The results show that both pressurization and H2O can promote char conversion and facilitate the for-mation of carbon-oxygen bonds on the char surface. Pressure mainly affects the consumption and generation of micropores, while the effect of H2O on the pore structure has no obvious selectivity. Pressurization reduces the relative content of C-C, while H2O has the opposite effect. At low pressure (0.1-0.7 MPa) and low H2O con-centration (0-40%), pressurization and H2O can promote the formation of C(O) on the surface of char. The reactivity of char first decreased and then increased with increasing pressure and increasing H2O concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据