4.7 Article

Influence of isovalent and aliovalent dopants on the reactivity of cerium oxide for catalytic applications

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 57-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.01.044

关键词

Ceria; Coprecipitation; Isovalent/aliovalent metal ions; Soot oxidation; CO oxidation

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, under SERB Scheme [SB/S1/PC-106/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of dopant size and valence state on the reduction properties, oxygen defects, and lattice strain in doped ceria has been studied fastidiously. This is of particular importance in environmental application, such as soot and CO oxidation. Herein, isovalent (Zr4+) and aliovalent (La3+, Eu3+, and Sm3+) metal ions doped ceria catalysts were synthesized by coprecipitation method with aqueous ammonia as the precipitant. The interplay of dopant size and valence in the ceria lattice is experimentally analysed in detail at the structural and electronic level by XRD, BET, TEM, Raman, TPR, and XPS techniques, and finally evaluated for soot and CO oxidation reactions. According to the analysis results, the size or the valence of the dopant or both together positively influence the ceria properties. The isovalent substituent (Zr4+), which is different in size with respect to ceria, enhanced the ceria intrinsic activity by decreasing its reduction temperature and oxygen vacancy formation energy, thereby increased the activity. Whereas, aliovalent dopants (La3+, Eu3+, and Sm3+) having different in size and valence compared to pure ceria further improved the structural and catalytic properties of bare ceria by inducing additional oxygen vacancies. The observed activity of doped materials towards soot and CO oxidation reactions is as follows: aliovalent doped ceria > isovalent doped ceria > ceria. The marked influence of isovalent and aliovalent dopants on the ceria properties are highlighted in this study. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据