4.7 Article

The effects of germination on the composition and functional properties of hemp seed protein isolate

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108085

关键词

Hemp seed protein; Germination; Functionality; Plant protein; Ingredients; Gelation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of germination on the functional properties of hemp seed protein isolates. The results showed that germination can degrade seed storage proteins, alter protein surface charge, and increase protein solubility, water holding capacity, and foaming capacity. Germination also increased the hardness of hemp seed protein gels. Therefore, germination can be used as a clean-label process to improve the functional properties of hemp seed protein.
The effects of germination on the functional properties of hemp seed protein isolates was evaluated in this study. Significant seed storage protein degradation was observed after three days of germination, while protein surface charge was altered after one day of germination. Protein solubility increased in neutral to slightly acidic pH, with 5-day germination increasing hemp seed protein solubility from 10.3% to 21.8% at pH 7.0. Water holding capacity increased from 1.03 g H2O/g isolate to 1.34 g H2O/g isolate while oil holding capacity stayed relatively constant. Germinated protein isolates demonstrated higher foaming capacity (69.2%-111.2%) and foaming stability (53.6%-75.1%) than non-germinated protein isolates. Five-day germinated hemp seed protein isolate was the only adequate emulsifier in this study, capable of stabilizing emulsion droplets down to 2.90 mu m in diameter. Hemp seed protein formed self-supporting gels at minimum of 2 or 3 w/v %, and germination increased the hardness of hemp seed protein gels (38.02 g-49.12 g for 10 w/v % gels). These findings indicate the ability to leverage germination as a clean-label process for improving the functional properties of hemp seed protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据