4.7 Article

SERS-active plasmonic metal NP-CsPbX3 films for multiple veterinary drug residues detection

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 412, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135420

关键词

SERS; Au NBP@Ag NRs; CsPbX3 QDs; Films; Veterinary drug residues

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, uniform plasmonic Au nanobipyramids@Ag nanorods (Au NBP@Ag NR)-CsPbX3 films with strong surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) activity were constructed for the sensitive and multiple detection of veterinary drug residues. CsPbI3 quantum dots (QDs) with large dielectric constant and plasmon-induced metal-to-perovskite interfacial charge transfer transition contributed to the SERS enhancement. The SERS-active films exhibited excellent sensitivity and reproducibility for the quantitative and accurate detection of chloramphenicol, diazepam and malachite green in food matrix.
Sensitive and multiple veterinary drug residues detection is of important for food safety. Herein, uniform plas-monic Au nanobipyramids@Ag nanorods (Au NBP@Ag NR)-CsPbX3 films with strong surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) activity were constructed. The effects of different CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I, or mixed halogens) quantum dots (QDs) on the SERS performances of plasmonic metal NP films were investigated. CsPbI3 QDs with large dielectric constant could be served as the dielectric media to retard the attenuation of electromagnetic evanescent wave, inducing strong electromagnetic strength for SERS enhancement. Plasmon-induced metal-to-perovskite interfacial charge transfer transition also contributed to SERS enhancement. SERS-active plasmonic Au NBP@Ag NR-CsPbI3 films had excellent sensitivity and high reproducibility for quantitative, accurate and multiple detection of chloramphenicol, diazepam and malachite green in food matrix. This work deepened the understanding of the SERS enhancement mechanisms of plasmonic metal NP-perovskite hybrid heterostructures, showing potential prospects in food safety monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据