4.7 Article

Microplastics contamination in eggs: Detection, occurrence and status

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 397, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133771

关键词

Microplastics; Eggs; Digestion; Characterization; Distribution in eggs; Estimation of intake

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Key R & D Pro- gram of China
  3. Science and technology planning project of Jiangsu market supervision and Administration Bureau
  4. Open Project of Engineering Research Center of Dairy Quality and Safety Control Technology of Ministry of Education of China
  5. [32172326]
  6. [2018YFC1602300]
  7. [2020YFC1606800]
  8. [BE2019362]
  9. [KJ204132]
  10. [KJ21125006]
  11. [R202101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to detect and analyze the presence of microplastics (MPs) in eggs, providing information on the content, shape, and type of MPs in eggs. The results showed that the main type of MPs in eggs was polyethylene, with a higher amount in egg yolk and no significant change after cooking. In addition, the daily human intake of MPs was estimated.
Nowadays, the widespread distribution of microplastics (MPs) in various foods has received much attention. In this study, eggs were purchased as samples from local supermarkets to detect and analyze the presence of MPs. The digestion method was optimized for eggs to better isolate MPs, which proved MPs indeed exist in eggs, and the average content was 11.67 +/- 3.98 particles/egg. The shape and size range of most MPs were spherical and 50-100 mu m. The infrared results showed that the main type of MPs in eggs was polyethylene. The number of MPs in egg yolk was higher than that in egg white, and there was no significant change after cooking. In addition, the daily human intake of MPs was estimated. Therefore, the results of this study provided a background for the current status and pollution of MPs in eggs, and proposed the necessary control and preventive measures to avoid this situation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据