4.7 Article

Investigation of the formation mechanism and β-carotene encapsulation stability of emulsion gels based on egg yolk granules and sodium alginate

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 400, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134032

关键词

Egg yolk granule; Sodium alginate; Emulsion gel; beta-Carotene; Encapsulation stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the effects of pH on the formation of heat-induced EYGs/SA emulsion gel. The results revealed that under pH 7.5 conditions, the surface charge of EYGs increased and non-covalent interactions with SA were enhanced, which dominated the gel formation process. Additionally, the results showed that samples with an appropriate amount of SA had the smallest particle size and highest G'. Excess SA caused depletion flocculation and resulted in an uneven network structure. Moreover, it was found that SA could improve the storage stability and decrease the bioaccessibility of beta-carotene in the emulsion gel.
The formation mechanism of heat-induced egg yolk granules (EYGs)/sodium alginate (SA) emulsion gel was studied under pH 6.2 and 7.5. Particle size, water holding capacity, LF NMR, and protein solubility revealed that pH 7.5 increased the surface charge of EYGs and enhanced non-covalent interaction with SA, and hydrogen bonding dominated of the gel formation process. Microscopy and rheological analysis indicated that samples with 0.75% SA had the smallest particle size and highest G', with chain-like oil droplets. Excess SA (1%) led to depletion flocculation due to SA structural rearrangements around oil droplets caused by the increase in negatively charged, causing uneven network structure. The in vitro release property and storage stability of beta-carotene loaded in the EYGs/SA emulsion gel showed that SA increased storage stability and decreased bioaccessibility of beta-carotene with delayed digestion rate. These results provide a theoretical basis for the nutrient delivery system in gel foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据