4.7 Article

Metabolic profile and dynamic characteristic of rhubarb during the vitro biotransformation by human gut microbiota

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 397, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133840

关键词

Raw rhubarb; Steamed rhubarb; Human gut microbiota; Laxative effects; Quantitative analysis; In vitro biotransformation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773907]
  2. Scientific and technological innovation project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences [CI2021A04207]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central public welfare research institutes [ZZ13-YQ-042, ZXKT21021]
  4. Shimadzu (China) Co., Ltd Waters Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted in vitro metabolism research and found that gut microbiota can influence the metabolism of rhubarb, which may be the reason for the differences in laxative effects between raw pieces of rhubarb and steamed pieces of rhubarb.
Rhubarb is a popular food in the world with laxative effects and steamed pieces of rhubarb (SP) have been widely applied to treatment of constipation in China due to its safety and effectiveness. In the study, metabolism in vitro was conducted to study influence of gut microbiota between raw pieces of rhubarb (RP) and SP. The results showed obvious classifications in metabolic profile between RP and SP were revealed by chemometric analysis, and prompted gut microbiota affected metabolism of rhubarb. Furthermore, 16 characteristic components were identified to distinguish the differences in metabolism. Finally, quantitative analysis of 14 components were verified the regulation of gut microbiota on rhubarb and discovered concentration of components affected the rate of metabolism. The study indicated regulation by gut microbiota could be probably responsible for differences of laxative effects between RP and SP, providing new perspective for exploring mechanisms of effectiveness in clinical application for SP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据