4.4 Article

Risk assessment of hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) in the Korean diet

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2022.2146210

关键词

Contamination; monitoring; POPs; risk assessment; hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study established an analytical method for assessing the concentration of Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) in Korean food and conducted a risk assessment for Korean food consumption. The results showed that the daily intakes of HCBD were below the tolerable daily intake (TDI) established by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NiFDS) in Korea. Considering the risk index of 0.011%, it can be concluded that there are no health concerns for the Korean population.
Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) is a persistent organic pollutant (POP), and a toxin whose primary target organ is the kidney. Consequently, quantifying the amount of HCBD in food is essential for determining whether it poses a health risk. The current study established and validated an analytical method for assessing HCBD in food using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Subsequently, we conducted for the first time a risk assessment of HCBD through Korean food consumption. The ranges of HCBD concentration in 595 food samples were as follows: not detectable (nd)-0.947 ng/g for agricultural products, nd-0.920 ng/g for animal products, nd-1.323 ng/g for fishery products and nd-1.081 ng/g for processed food products. The daily intakes of HCBD for the general population were 0.22 ng/kg body weight (b.w.)/day for agricultural products, 0.30 ng/kg b.w./day for animal products, 0.07 ng/kg b.w./day for fishery products and 0.33 ng/kg b.w./day for processed food products. These exposure levels are below the tolerable daily intake (TDI, 2 mu g/kg body weight/day) established by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NiFDS) in the Republic of Korea. Taking into account the risk index of 0.011%, we can, therefore, conclude that there are no health concerns for the Korean population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据