4.5 Review

A review of estimation methods for natural mortality and their performance in the context of fishery stock assessment

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106489

关键词

Fisheries management; Natural mortality; Parameter estimation; Population dynamics; Stock assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural mortality (M), an important parameter in fisheries stock assessment and management, is difficult to estimate and uncertain. This paper reviews various methods to estimate M and suggests that directly estimating M using data and assigning a prior based on empirical methods is the most effective approach.
Natural mortality (M) is one of the most influential parameters in fisheries stock assessment and management. It relates directly to stock productivity and reference points used for fisheries management advice. Unfortunately, M is also very difficult to estimate, and hence very uncertain. Representing the uncertainty in M and how this influences estimates of management quantities is therefore an important component of conducting stock as-sessments. This paper outlines the range of methods available to estimate M for use in stock assessment. The methods include those based on maximum age, life history theory, relationships between well-known values for M (those found in the literature and based on data for the stock being assessed) and covariates, use of tagging data and catch curve analysis, and estimation within a single-or multi-species stock assessment model. All methods are likely subject to bias and imprecision due to incorrect assumptions and incomplete data. Further-more, M is generally assumed to be constant over time, age, and sex -assumptions that are unlikely to be true for any stock. Based on our review, there is an obvious benefit to directly estimating M using data and within a stock assessment while assigning a prior based on empirical methods. This approach effectively uses all the available information while also representing the uncertainty. Carefully examining diagnostics and checking for model misspecification is required to ensure that the available data and stock assessment model assumptions are appropriately informative about M when it is estimated during the model fitting process. For situations where direct estimation is not possible (a condition found in data-limited to data-rich stock assessments), the use of multiple methods with robust sensitivity exploration is recommended. Even when direct data are integrated into a stock assessment, we recommend using other methods to estimate M and analysing the direct data outside the stock assessment model as diagnostic tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据