4.5 Article

Cushion Polyurethane Sandwich Composite Structures Strengthened by a Concave-Convex Fabric Panels

期刊

FIBERS AND POLYMERS
卷 23, 期 13, 页码 3615-3623

出版社

KOREAN FIBER SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-022-4533-1

关键词

Concave-convex fabric structure; Sandwich foam FPUs; Dynamic cushion performance; Theoretical prediction; Sandwich composite structures

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian, China
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin, China
  4. [18JCQNJC03400]
  5. [2018J01504]
  6. [2018J01505]
  7. [TD13-5043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a flexible PU foam composite with a sandwich structure to improve low velocity impact resistance. The results show significant improvement in dynamic cushion performance through the design of the interlayer structure, and they are validated through experimental and theoretical calculations.
In order to improve the low velocity impact resistance, flexible PU foam composites (FPUC) with a sandwich structure are proposed. The interlayer is composed of a concave-convex fabric structure while the top/bottom layers are made of polyurethane foam (PU). The core is prepared as follows. Seven warp knitted spacer fabric types (WKSF) (WKSF.1-7) are laminated with different number of layers to form cuboids, which are fixed firmly between two layers of low melting point polyester (LMPET) fabrics via hot melting. The effects of spacer yarn density, spacer yarn inclination angle, combination of spacer fabrics, and number of lamination layers on the dynamic cushion performance are evaluated. With the impact energy being 16 J, FPUs demonstrate an energy absorption level that is 19 % and 39 % greater than PU and WKSF. Furthermore, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fabric can effectively enhance the surface strength. Finally, the results are computed via theoretical prediction formulae of dynamic buffer resistance is in conformity with the experimental test results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据