4.7 Article

Solving fuzzy robust facility layout problem equipped with cranes using MPS algorithm and modified NSGA-II

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118402

关键词

Population-based simulated annealing; Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II; Small gantry crane; Wall mounted jib crane; Dynamic facility layout problem; Forbidden areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facility layout problems refer to the placement of facilities in a plant region. This paper proposed a facility layout problem based on fuzzy random variables, aiming to minimize materials handling cost and maximize cranes usability. Two algorithms were proposed and six case studies were conducted, showing that each algorithm has its own advantages in different aspects.
Facility layout problems are defined as the placement of facilities in a plant region. In this paper a facility layout problem was clarified by the facility dimensions and the materials flow between facilities are uncertain as fuzzy random variables and the plant region was equipped with the wall mounted jib cranes and the small gate cranes and there were some forbidden areas in the plant region where the placement of facilities were forbidden. The objective functions of the problems have been contemplated as minimizing materials handling cost of the operators and the cranes and for the first time maximizing cranes usability of wall mounted jib cranes and small gate cranes by calculating their covered area on the facilities. To solve the problem a multi-objective populationbased on simulated annealing algorithm (MPS) and a Modified Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (MNSGA-II) was proposed then six case studies were solved by them. The results reveal that run time of the MNSGA-II for large size problems are better than the MPS algorithm and the MPS algorithm finds better solutions with materials handling cost of the operators and the cranes and the MNSGA-II finds better solutions with cranes usability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据