4.7 Article

An ensemble credit scoring model based on logistic regression with heterogeneous balancing and weighting effects

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118732

关键词

Logistic regression; Logistic-BWE model; Sample balancing algorithm; Ensemble credit scoring models; Dynamic weighting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel ensemble model called logistic-BWE based on logistic regression, which generates multiple training sub datasets using sample balancing algorithm and dynamically calculates the weight of predicted results based on the performance in the validation stage. Empirical results show that the logistic-BWE model has the strongest ability to recognize default samples, best generalization ability, and maintains interpretability.
The logistic regression model is widely used in credit scoring practice due to its strong interpretability of results, but its recognition performance for default samples which are minority in real-world imbalanced data sets need to be improved. This paper designs a novel ensemble model based on logistic regression as the logistic-BWE model. It first carries out data preprocessing, then applying sample balancing algorithm to generate several training sub data sets with different imbalance ratios and constructing sub models respectively, finally according to the performance of each sub model in the validation stage, the weight of predicted results for different class of each sub model is dynamically calculated. The empirical results indicate that compared with ten representative credit scoring models on six public data sets, the logistic-BWE model has the strongest ability to recognize default samples, and has the best generalization ability on most data sets while maintaining the interpretability. Further tests demonstrate that the performance superiority of the logistic-BWE model is statistically significant, and it also has excellent robustness when it contains a sufficient number of sub models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据