4.5 Review

Recent developments in adjunct therapies for type 1 diabetes

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2159806

关键词

Adjunct therapy; type 1 diabetes; SGLT-2 inhibitors; GLP-1 receptor agonists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although there have been many advances in the treatment of type 1 diabetes, optimal glycemic control is still only achieved in a minority. Adjunct therapy, including insulin analogues, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and others, is being investigated as a strategy to improve outcomes in type 1 diabetes.
IntroductionThere have been many recent advances in the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) including in insulin formulations, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and automated insulin delivery. However, long-term optimal glycemic control is still only achieved in a minority.Areas coveredAdjunct therapy - the use of therapeutic agents other than insulin - is one strategy aimed at improving outcomes. An ideal adjunct agent would improve glycemic control, reduce weight (or weight gain), reduce insulin requirement and prevent complications (e.g. cardiorenal) without increasing hypoglycemia. The amylin analogue pramlintide has been licensed in the USA, while the sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) dapagliflozin, was briefly (2019 - 2021) licensed for type 1 diabetes in Europe and the UK. However, other agents from the type 2 diabetes (T2D) arena including metformin, other SGLT2is, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitors have been investigated.Expert opinionAs evidence emerges for cardiorenal protection by SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in T2D, it has become increasingly important to know whether people with T1D can also benefit. Here, we review recent trials of adjunct agents in T1D and discuss the efficacy and safety of these agents (alone and in combination) in an era in which continuous glucose monitoring is becoming standard of care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据