4.3 Article

Long-Term Extreme Load Prediction of Spar and Semisubmersible Floating Wind Turbines Using the Environmental Contour Method

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4032099

关键词

design load; offshore wind turbine; environmental contour method; long-term prediction; inverse first-order reliability method

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [PTDC/ECM/111242/2009]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) [SFRH/BPD/81010/2011]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ECM/111242/2009, SFRH/BPD/81010/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of extreme loads for the offshore floating wind turbine is analyzed based on the inverse reliability technique. The inverse reliability approach is in general used to establish the design levels associated with the specified probability of failure. The present study is performed using the environmental contour (EC) method to estimate the long-term joint probability distribution of extreme loads for different types of offshore floating wind turbines. The analysis is carried out in order to predict the out-of-plane bending moment (OoPBM) loads at the blade root and tower base moment (TBM) loads for a 5MW offshore floating wind turbine of different floater configuration. The spar-type and semisubmersible type offshore floating wind turbines are considered for the analysis. The FAST code is used to simulate the wind conditions for various return periods and the design loads of various floating wind turbine configurations. The extreme and operation situation of the spar-type and semisubmersible type offshore floating wind turbine are analyzed using one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D)-EC methods for different return periods. The study is useful to predict long-term design loads for offshore wind turbines without requiring excessive computational effort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据