4.7 Review

Electrospun nanofiber nerve guidance conduits for peripheral nerve A review

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111663

关键词

Peripheral nerve injuries; Nerve guidance conduits; Nanofibrous scaffolds; Conducting polymers; Electrical conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review presents the challenges associated with autologous nerve grafting and the potential of artificial nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) as an alternative treatment method for peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs). The tubular NGCs provide guidance and protection for nerve growth and elongation. Novel designs of electrospun NGCs offer promising prospects for functional recovery.
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) often lead to permanent impairment of functional movement and sensory loss due to limited effective treatment options. Currently, autologous nerve grafting has been widely used in practice, however it remains challenging due to pre-and post-surgery issues such as limited availability of donor nerve tissue, size mismatch, and donor site morbidity. Moreover, these issues are further exacerbated in treating PNIs with larger nerve gaps. To overcome the challenges associated with autologous nerve grafting, a treatment method with artificial nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) has been developed as a promising alternative technique. Tubular in shape, an NGC bridges the two ends of damaged nerves and provides directional guidance and physical protection for axonal growth and nerve elongation. Nanofibrous NGCs resemble the structural envi-ronment of the endogenous extracellular matrix (ECM) with the use of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. With new advances in the electrospinning technique, novel NGCs designs are proposed for greater functional recovery. This review covers peripheral nerve regeneration efficacy of electrospun NGCs exhibited in vivo and in vitro studies. NGCs with varying polymer compositions, simulating agents, and electrical stimulation were compiled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据