4.6 Article

Endocrine-related adverse conditions in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition: an ESE clinical practice guideline

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 187, 期 6, 页码 G1-G21

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-22-0689

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the treatment and follow-up of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced endocrine side-effects. A systematic approach to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up is needed, including baseline tests of endocrine function before each treatment cycle. There is no clear evidence for the benefit of high-dose glucocorticoids in treating endocrine toxicities, with the possible exceptions of severe thyroid eye disease and hypophysitis affecting the visual apparatus. Most endocrine dysfunctions appear to be permanent regardless of ICI discontinuation.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment but are associated with significant autoimmune endocrinopathies that pose both diagnostic and treatment challenges. The aim of this guideline is to provide clinicians with the best possible evidence-based recommendations for treatment and follow-up of patients with ICI-induced endocrine side-effects based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. As these drugs have been used for a relatively short time, large systematic investigations are scarce. A systematic approach to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up is needed, including baseline tests of endocrine function before each treatment cycle. We conclude that there is no clear evidence for the benefit of high-dose glucocorticoids to treat endocrine toxicities with the possible exceptions of severe thyroid eye disease and hypophysitis affecting the visual apparatus. With the exception of thyroiditis, most endocrine dysfunctions appear to be permanent regardless of ICI discontinuation. Thus, the development of endocrinopathies does not dictate a need to stop ICI treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据