4.5 Article

Evaluation of the Reveal® rapid AST system to assess the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from blood cultures

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04556-2

关键词

P. aeruginosa; Reveal (R) rapid AST system; Antibiotics; Blood cultures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the performance of the Reveal (R) rapid AST system in determining the drug susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains directly from blood cultures. The Reveal (R) AST system provided MIC results for the 11 antipseudomonal antibiotics tested within a mean time to result of 6 h 22 min. Comparing to the GN6F panel, it showed a high overall rate of categorical agreement (96.1%) and low rates of major errors (4.2%) and minor errors (0.6%).
This study was set up to assess the performance of the Reveal (R) rapid AST system to determine the drug susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains directly from blood cultures. Two hundred fully sequenced clinical P. aeruginosa strains were selected for the evaluation, of which 26.5% (n = 53) produced transferable beta-lactamases, and 2.0 to 33.0% had susceptibility levels close to the EUCAST 2021 breakpoints of 11 commonly used antipseudomonal antibiotics. The Reveal (R) AST system was run with a commercial MIC microplate designed for fast-growing Gram-negative bacilli (Microscan Neg MDR MIC 1), and was compared to the manually operated GN6F MIC microdilution panel from Thermo Fisher, as a comparator method. The Reveal (R) AST system provided MIC results for the 11 antipseudomonal antibiotics tested within a mean time to result of 6 h 22 min. By comparison with the GN6F panel, the overall rates of categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor errors (mE for meropenem only) were 96.1%, 1.6%, 4.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. The Specific Reveal (R) AST system appears to be a reliable and fast technology to determine the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to antibiotics, including those with resistance levels near categorical breakpoints, directly from blood cultures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据