4.4 Article

An unusual magnetic phenomenon in Mg doping [(CH3)2NH2] CoxMg1-x[HCOO]3 frameworks

期刊

EPL
卷 140, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/aca42d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program B
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [XDB07010300]
  4. [11674376]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Mg-doped metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) single crystals were synthesized, and the effects of Mg ion doping on the magnetic properties of MOFs were investigated. The results showed that Mg ion is uniformly doped into the Co-based MOFs crystal, leading to a decrease in the antiferromagnetic phase transition temperature and the emergence of abnormal magnetic hysteresis behavior.
In this study, Mg doping metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [(CH3)(2)NH2] Co1-xMgx[HCOO](3) single crystals were synthesized by solvothermal method with normal ratios x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX) results showed that Mg ion is uniformly doped into Co-based MOFs crystal. With the increase of diamagnetic magnesium ions doping, the antiferromagnetic phase transition temperature of Co-based MOFs for pure Co-MOF decreased from 15K to 7.5K for x = 0.4. Abnormal larger magnetic hysteresis was obtained for Mg doping crystals with a large coercive field 3100 Oe (x = 0.1), 3700 Oe ( x = 0.2), 2900 Oe (x = 0.3) compared with 600 Oe coercive field for pure Co-MOFs (x = 0). At the same time, step-like behavior was first observed on Mg2+ doping sample with x = 0.1-0.3. This unusual magnetic phenomenon is well interpreted based on the coexistence of long-range canted antiferromagnetic order and isolated single-ion quantum magnets. The diamagnetic magnesium ions doping decreases the strong exchange coupling between neighboring Co ions and step-like behavior stemmed from the quantum tunneling of isolated Co ions. Copyright (C) 2022 EPLA

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据