4.7 Article

Remediation effects and mechanisms of typical minerals combined with inorganic amendment on cadmium-contaminated soil: a field study in wheat

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 13, 页码 38605-38615

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24976-5

关键词

Minerals; Soil remediation; Cadmium; Wheat; Rhizosphere; Mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the remediation effect and mechanism of cadmium (Cd) in weakly alkaline soil using zeolite, diatomite, and sodium bentonite as the main components, supplemented by calcium dihydrogen phosphate and fulvic acid. The results show that the concentration of Cd in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil decreases, and there is a reduction in Cd concentration in wheat grains.
The remediation of cadmium (Cd)-contaminated soil has gained much attention recently because Cd in soil threatens human health through the food chain. Although tremendous progress has been made in the remediation of Cd-contaminated soil in rice acid soil system, the mechanism and effects of Cd-contaminated soil remediation under these amendments in wheat weak alkaline soil are still limited. In this study, the remediation effect and related mechanism of Cd in weakly alkaline soil were carried out using zeolite, diatomite, and sodium bentonite as the main remediation components, supplemented by calcium dihydrogen phosphate and fulvic acid. The results of field experiments showed that the concentration of Cd reduced by 27.3 similar to 31.2% in rhizosphere soil and 34.3 similar to 54.2% in non-rhizosphere soil, and the maximum reduction rate of Cd concentration in wheat grain was 25.5%. The main factors affecting the concentration of Cd in wheat grains include the change in exchangeable Cd, the absorption capacity of wheat root, and the inhibitory effect on Cd transport from stem to grain in this paper. In general, this work provides a new potential management feasible pathway to alleviate the Cd toxicity of weakly alkaline soil and wheat grain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据