4.7 Article

Synthesis of hierarchically porous carbon spheres with yolk-shell structure for high performance supercapacitors

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 199-208

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.08.037

关键词

Porous carbon; Yolk-shell; Sol-gel; Co-assembly; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [21210004]
  2. State Key Basic Research Program of China [2012CB0224805, 2013CB934104]
  3. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08DZ2270500]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B108]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531114]
  6. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RGP-227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uniform yolk-shelled carbon spheres (YS-CSs) with a hierarchically porous nanoarchitecture have successfully been synthesized through a new gradient sol-gel process with surfactant-directing co-assembly by using cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a template, resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) as a carbon source and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as an assistant pore-forming agent. The effects of CTAB and TEOS on the yolk-shell structure and pore properties of the carbon spheres are systematically investigated. Characterizations from SEM and HR-SEM, TEM, N-2 sorption, FTIR, and TG techniques reveal that the obtained YS-CSs possess a microporous yolk, mesoporous shell and macroporous hollow cavity between the yolk and shell, high specific surface areas (887-1085 m(2)/g) and large pore volumes (1.4-2.8 cm(3)/g). Moreover, the yolk diameter can be well controlled from 320 to 600 nm, the shell thickness from 140 to 250 nm and the mesopore size from 4.6 to 10.6 nm by simply adjusting amount of CTAB and TEOS. When evaluated as electrode materials for supercapacitor applications, the YS-CSs exhibit high performance with a high specific capacitance and a good rate capability (75% retention ratio at a high current density of 20 A/g). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据