4.7 Article

Biomonitoring of heavy metals and their association with DNA damage in Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) under captivity

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 13, 页码 38306-38318

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24898-2

关键词

Biodiversity; P. cristatus; Pollution; Contamination; Comet assay; DNA damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the concentrations of heavy metals in soil, water, feed, feathers, and blood, and investigated their association with DNA damage in P. cristatus. The results showed variations in heavy metal concentrations across different environmental samples, and some heavy metal concentrations were significantly correlated with DNA damage.
Environmental pollution and changing climatic conditions are likely to damage biodiversity not only on organismal level but on molecular level as well. The aim of the present study was to find the concentration of heavy metals in soil, water, feed, feathers, and blood and association of heavy metals with DNA damage of P. cristatus. The results showed that lead (Pb) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in soil and cadmium (Cd) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in soil and water. Chromium (Cr), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), and cobalt (Co) were significant (P < 0.01) in feed. Manganese (Mn) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in feed and soil (surface). In addition, Pb and Cd concentrations were significant (P < 0.01) in feathers while Cr and Zn concentrations were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in feces. Nickel was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in feathers and eggshell while Mn and Co concentrations were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in blood and feces, respectively. Furthermore, significant positive correlation between Pb (r(s) = 0.75; P < 0.05) and Cd (r(s) = 0.67; P < 0.05) concentrations in blood with tail DNA was found. It was concluded that heavy metals exist in the soil, water, feathers, and blood and have association with DNA damage of P. cristatus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据