4.7 Article

A novel S-scheme Ws2/BiYWO6 electrostatic heterostructure for enhanced photocatalytic degradation performance towards the degradation of Rhodamine B

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 34468-34480

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24614-0

关键词

S-scheme; WS2/BiYWO6; Rhodamine B; Visible light; Photocatalyst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Constructing S-scheme heterojunction between two semiconductor materials is an effective route to increase the photocatalytic degradation efficiency. A novel S-scheme WS2/BiYWO6 heterojunction photocatalyst was prepared by wet chemical route, and its photocatalytic degradation performance was evaluated by analyzing the degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light. The 20 wt.% WS2 loaded WS2/BiYWO(6) composite exhibited enhanced photocatalytic degradation ability, with O-2(center dot)- and (OH)-O-center dot radicals playing a crucial role in the degradation process.
Constructing S-scheme heterojunction between two semiconductor materials is an effective route to increase the photocatalytic degradation efficiency. Here, a novel S-scheme WS2/BiYWO6 heterojunction photocatalyst was prepared by wet chemical route. At the same time, the photocatalytic degradation performance of the fabricated materials was analyzed by the degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light. Of all prepared WS2/BiYWO6 composites, the 20 wt.% WS2 loaded WS2/BiYWO(6)composite exhibited an enhanced photocatalytic degradation ability than other prepared photocatalysts. Here, O-2(center dot)- and (OH)-O-center dot radicals are performing a pivotal role in the Rhodamine B degradation and the optimized composite shows greater photocurrent intensity than pure BiYWO6 and WS2, respectively. Also, the synthesized photocatalyst maintains its stability with negligible changes even after three cycles. Thereby, the constructed S-scheme WS2/BiYWO6 heterojunction is a potential material for the wastewater remediation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据