4.7 Article

Pseudomonas aeruginosa improved the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass on nonylphenol-cadmium co-contaminated soil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 28247-28258

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24224-w

关键词

Nonylphenol; Cadmium; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Microbial community structure; Phytoremediation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of Pseudomonas aeruginosa can enhance the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass on soil contaminated with nonylphenol and cadmium by promoting beneficial microorganisms and increasing key enzyme activities. Furthermore, Pseudomonas aeruginosa does not become the dominant bacterial species.
The effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) on the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass on soil contaminated with nonylphenol (NP) and cadmium (Cd) was investigated by pot experiments. Pseudomonas aeruginosa application stimulated the adsorption of Cd by ryegrass and facilitated the biodegradation of NP in the soil. Exogenous P. aeruginosa inoculation increased the activities of unease, dehydrogenase, and polyphenol oxidase in the soil of the T4 treatment by 38.5%, 50.0%, and 56.5% compared to that of the T2 treatment, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between the activities of dehydrogenase and polyphenol oxidase and the NP removal rate (P < 0.001). The relative abundances of beneficial microorganisms (such as Sphingomonas, Lysobacter, Streptomyces, Chloroflexia, Deltaproteobacteria, and Alphaproteobacteria) were increased as a result of P. aeruginosa inoculation. These microorganisms play important roles in nutrient cycling, Cd adsorption, and NP degradation. Additionally, P. aeruginosa was not the dominate bacterial species at the end of the experiment. According to this study, P. aeruginosa application improved the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass on soil contaminated with NP and Cd, with a minimal risk of alien microbial invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据