4.7 Article

A novel two-phase group decision-making model for circular supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 34135-34157

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24486-4

关键词

Picture fuzzy sets; Group decision-making; MARCOS; AHP; Interval grey numbers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circular supply chain management (CSCM) integrates circular thinking into supply chain management to promote sustainability. This paper proposes a novel two-phase group decision-making approach, combining PF-AHP and MARCOS-G models, to select railway material suppliers within the circular economy perspective. The results show that MARCOS-G consistently ranks A4 as the top supplier in all 50 scenarios, providing a reliable method for supplier selection in CSCM.
Circular supply chain management (CSCM), which incorporates circular thinking into supply chain management, promotes supply chain sustainability by offering a novel and compelling viewpoint. In the CSCM, supplier selection is crucial in establishing a competitive edge among businesses by decreasing environmental degradation and related supply chain expenses. This paper aims to propose a novel two-phase group decision-making approach, which combines the picture fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process (PF-AHP) and grey Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking According to Compromise Solution (MARCOS-G) model to select railway material suppliers within the scope of circular economy perspective. In group decision-making, a picture fuzzy number-based approach aggregates individual decision makers'(DMs) opinions and provides a lower level of computing complexity and a higher level of performance. The PF-AHP has been used to produce the weights of the criteria, and the MARCOS-G technique has been used to rank the suppliers and choose the most appropriate one. The results and verification of the novel method are carried out throughout a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. For this purpose, 50 scenarios with changes in the weight values of criteria were developed. In the validation analysis, a comparison with other grey COPRAS, TOPSIS, ARAS and WASPAS methods were performed. Due to the ranking results obtained from Spearman's correlation analyses, the MARCOS-G is almost consistent and it can be seen that the A4 remains the top supplier in all 50 scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据