4.8 Article

Response to the Upcoming Emerging Waste: Necessity and Feasibility Analysis of Photovoltaic Waste Recovery in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 56, 期 23, 页码 17396-17409

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c06956

关键词

photovoltaic waste quantification; metal criticality; environmental impacts; economic feasibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [52170146]
  3. [52170136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the necessity and feasibility of photovoltaic waste recovery in China and quantifies the amount of photovoltaic waste. The study finds that the recovery of indium, selenium, cadmium, and gallium from photovoltaic waste is crucial to alleviate resource shortage, and the full recovery method can significantly reduce environmental burdens.
With the widespread photovoltaic deployment to achieve the net-zero energy goal, the resulting photovoltaic waste draws attention. In China, considerable steps have not been taken for photovoltaic waste management. The lack of relevant scientific information on photovoltaic waste brings difficulties to the establishment of photovoltaic waste regulatory systems. In this study, the necessity and feasibility of photovoltaic waste recovery were investigated. In China, the photovoltaic waste stream was quantified as 48.67- 60.78 million tin 2050. In photovoltaic waste, indium, selenium, cadmium, and gallium were in high risk, judging by the metal criticality analysis, which meant that their recovery was significant to alleviate the resource shortage. The full recovery method was proved to reduce the environmental burdens most. For cost and benefit analysis, the net present value/size was -1.02 $/kg according to the current industrial status. However, it can be profitable with the recovery of silver. This study provides scientific and comprehensive information for photovoltaic waste management in China and is expected to promote the sustainable development of photovoltaic industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据