Redox Potentials of Magnetite Suspensions under Reducing Conditions

Predicting the redox behavior of magnetite in reducing soils and sediments is challenging because there is neither agreement among measured potentials nor consensus on which Fe(III) | Fe(II) equilibria are most relevant. Here, we measured open-circuit potentials of stoichiometric magnetite equilibrated over a range of solution conditions. Notably, electron transfer mediators were not necessary to reach equilibrium. For conditions where ferrous hydroxide precipitation was limited, Nernstian behavior was observed with an EH vs pH slope of -179 +/- 4 mV and an EH vs Fe(II)aq slope of -54 +/- 4 mV. Our estimated EH o of 857 +/- 8 mV closely matches a maghemite|aqueous Fe(II) EHo of 855 mV, suggesting that it plays a dominant role in poising the solution potential and that it's theoretical Nernst equation of EH[mV] = 855 - 177 pH - 59 log [Fe2+] may be useful in predicting magnetite redox behavior under these conditions. At higher pH values and without added Fe(II), a distinct shift in potentials was observed, indicating that the dominant Fe(III)|Fe(II) couple(s) poising the potential changed. Our findings, coupled with previous Mo''ssbauer spectroscopy and kinetic data, provide compelling evidence that the maghemite/Fe(II)aq couple accurately predicts the redox behavior of stoichiometric magnetite suspensions in the presence of aqueous Fe(II) between pH values of 6.5 and 8.5.

Automated summary

Predicting the redox behavior of magnetite in reducing soils and sediments is challenging due to inconsistent measured potentials and the lack of consensus on relevant Fe(III) | Fe(II) equilibria. In this study, we measured open-circuit potentials of stoichiometric magnetite equilibrated under various solution conditions and found Nernstian behavior in certain conditions. Our findings suggest that the maghemite/Fe(II)aq couple accurately predicts the redox behavior of stoichiometric magnetite suspensions in the presence of aqueous Fe(II) between pH values of 6.5 and 8.5. Additionally, a distinct shift in potentials was observed at higher pH values and without added Fe(II), indicating a change in the dominant Fe(III)|Fe(II) couple(s) poising the potential.