4.6 Article

Informational Entropy Threshold as a Physical Mechanism for Explaining Tree-like Decision Making in Humans

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e24121819

关键词

decision making; entropy; eye-tracking

资金

  1. Spanish government [CGL2016-78156-C2-2-R]
  2. ERC [785932]
  3. MIUR
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [785932] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a mechanism based on Shannon entropy to compute the uncertainty of different options in order to describe human decision making in complex situations. Experimental evidence shows that humans effectively utilize prospection in maze navigation tasks, and the distribution of decision times exhibits power-law tails.
While approaches based on physical grounds (such as the drift-diffusion model-DDM) have been exhaustively used in psychology and neuroscience to describe perceptual decision making in humans, similar approaches to complex situations, such as sequential (tree-like) decisions, are still scarce. For such scenarios that involve a reflective prospection of future options, we offer a plausible mechanism based on the idea that subjects can carry out an internal computation of the uncertainty about the different options available, which is computed through the corresponding Shannon entropy. When the amount of information gathered through sensory evidence is enough to reach a given threshold in the entropy, this will trigger the decision. Experimental evidence in favor of this entropy-based mechanism was provided by exploring human performance during navigation through a maze on a computer screen monitored with the help of eye trackers. In particular, our analysis allows us to prove that (i) prospection is effectively used by humans during such navigation tasks, and an indirect quantification of the level of prospection used is attainable; in addition, (ii) the distribution of decision times during the task exhibits power-law tails, a feature that our entropy-based mechanism is able to explain, unlike traditional (DDM-like) frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据